Every competitive athlete is looking for the next new sports recovery tool product or technique that can either help them heal from an injury faster or perform better. In their quest to be the best, intelligently, they listen to so-called experts in the field. Unfortunately for the athlete, the so-called expert has learned how to jump on the latest trend and provide a scientific explanation for sports recovery tools based on tooth fairy science.

🔬What is Tooth Fairy Science? 

“Tooth Fairy science” is a term used to describe research that investigates phenomena without first establishing that the phenomenon actually exists, very popular when it comes to new and trending sports recovery tools.

It was popularized by skeptic Physician Harriet Hall and is often used to critique pseudoscientific or poorly grounded studies. For example, researchers might study how much money children receive under their pillows and find patterns based on age or geography. That’s all very efficacious in terms of showing consistent results under certain conditions. But if the researchers never question whether the Tooth Fairy is real, then they’re lacking internal validity, because the foundational causal link is flawed.

In short, it means doing scientific-sounding work on something unproven or imaginary. For the science nerds out there (like myself), it means showing effectiveness without establishing internal validity.

👉Sports Recovery Tools Based on Tooth Fairy Science

“Hope Not Nope wants to steer people away from being tempted by “quick fixes” that deliver empty promises, and steer those people toward that which has been proven to improve health, such as strength and power training, community, and living with purpose.” from CBS, NBC, FOX, and ABC

Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)

• Claim: Enhances muscle recovery, reduces inflammation, and improves performance.
• Tooth Fairy Science Issue: The theory of photobiomodulation—light stimulating mitochondrial function to trigger biological effects—comes largely from cell and animal studies. Translating those results to whole-body effects in humans is weakly supported.
• Problem: Studies show inconsistent outcomes, often with small effect sizes, questionable blinding, and varying wavelengths/dosages.
• Reality: Might show some benefit under ideal conditions (efficacy), but lacks clear internal validity in humans, especially in athletic performance.
  

Shockwave Therapy for Muscle and Tendon Injuries

• Claim: Acoustic waves break up scar tissue, stimulate healing.
• Tooth Fairy Science Issue: While shockwaves work well for kidney stones (with a clear mechanism), translating that idea to soft tissue recovery is mechanistically unclear.
• Problem: Often used for chronic tendinopathies, but the rationale (e.g., promoting regeneration via microtrauma) is speculative. Studies show mixed results, with a placebo often performing similarly.
• Reality: Widely used based on some clinical trials, but the why it works remains poorly supported—a classic sign of tooth fairy logic.
  

Percussion Guns (e.g., Theragun, Hypervolt)

• Claim: Loosen fascia, reduce soreness, enhance recovery.
• Tooth Fairy Science Issue: The idea of “releasing fascia” is not backed by real-time imaging or solid biomechanical models. There’s limited physiological evidence that high-frequency vibration has long-term effects on muscle or recovery.
• Problem: People report feeling better, but is that due to vibration, attention, placebo, or simple massage effects?
• Reality: Some short-term benefits (efficacy), but questionable mechanisms and overblown claims.
  

Kinesiology Tape

• Claim: Lifts the skin to improve circulation, reduce pain, and enhance performance.
• Tooth Fairy Science Issue: The “skin lifting” theory has no solid anatomical or physiological basis. Many studies find no difference between real and sham taping.
• Problem: Often shows minimal to no measurable effect beyond placebo.
• Reality: If it “works,” it’s probably due to sensory feedback or psychological effects, not the proposed biomechanical mechanisms.
  

 Whole-Body Cryotherapy

• Claim: Extreme cold reduces inflammation and speeds recovery.
• Tooth Fairy Science Issue: The idea that brief exposure to -100°C+ air has measurable cellular recovery effects lacks robust scientific backing. Mechanisms are speculative or based on animal/cellular models.
• Problem: Many studies use poor controls, subjective outcomes, and fail to isolate cryotherapy effects from general rest or placebo.
• Reality: May improve perceived soreness, but causal explanation is unproven—textbook tooth fairy science.

Dry Needling

• Claim: Inserting thin needles into myofascial trigger points deactivates them, reduces pain, improves range of motion, and promotes muscle healing.
• Tooth Fairy Science Issue: The central concept — that “trigger points” are distinct, pathological muscle knots that can be precisely located and deactivated — remains scientifically unproven. There’s no objective method to confirm their existence, and the mechanism by which needling them would cause healing is speculative.
• Problem: Many studies show short-term pain relief, but when sham or superficial needling is used as a control, results often become statistically indistinguishable. That points to placebo or contextual effects (therapist interaction, expectation) as the true driver of results.
• Reality: It may work in the sense that some people feel better after treatment (efficacy), but the causal explanation lacks internal validity, making this a classic case of tooth fairy science — measuring effects without proving the proposed cause.

Foot Detox Baths (e.g., Ionic Foot Baths)

• Claim: Pull toxins out of the body through the soles of the feet using ionized water and mild electrical currents. Often marketed to “cleanse the liver,” “balance energy,” or “remove heavy metals.”
• Tooth Fairy Science Issue: The foundational claim — that toxins can be drawn out through the feet into water — is biologically implausible. There’s no known physiological mechanism by which the body selectively purges systemic toxins through foot sweat into electrically charged water. The “toxins” discoloring the water are actually due to rust from the electrodes, not anything leaving the body.
• Problem: Scientific tests consistently show that water discolors regardless of whether feet are in the bath. Independent lab analysis of the water before and after shows no significant increase in actual toxins or heavy metals.
• Reality: There’s no credible evidence these baths remove toxins or improve health in any measurable way. If people feel better afterward, it’s likely due to relaxation, expectation, or placebo. The bath may feel soothing, but the causal claim (detoxification via feet) is pure pseudoscience, making this a textbook case of tooth fairy science.
  

Most sports recovery tools and techniques are based on tooth fairy science, showing effects without solid evidence of how or why they work. While they may provide short-term relief, it’s essential to prioritize methods with proven, scientifically backed mechanisms for lasting recovery and performance. Always question the cause behind the claim.

Interested in forgoing the tooth fairy, science-based sports recovery tools, and want to focus on what truly works for injury prevention and what to prioritize after the most common sports injuries? [Click here.]

Author: 

Dr. Dillon Caswell, PT, DPT, SCS

Hope Evangelist | Top-Selling Author & Speaker | Human Performance Expert